Sowell has reached a guru-like status—similar to Chomsky on the left—with many followers who insist he can do no wrong. In that sense, he is overrated.
But I think Sowell is still superior Ferguson. Ferguson relies too much on rhetoric rather than empirical evidence.
Sowell has reached a guru-like status—similar to Chomsky on the left—with many followers who insist he can do no wrong. In that sense, he is overrated.
But I think Sowell is still superior Ferguson. Ferguson relies too much on rhetoric rather than empirical evidence.
I'm just going off my personal impression based on a reading of one of his books and an article or two of his. It's possible I haven't sampled enough of his work to make an accurate judgement.
It's been a while—I don't even remember the name of the book. I just recall that, despite its stylish prose, it seemed light on hard-core empirical content. I prefer a more straightforward, just-the-facts style with minimal filler.
Sowell has reached a guru-like status—similar to Chomsky on the left—with many followers who insist he can do no wrong. In that sense, he is overrated.
But I think Sowell is still superior Ferguson. Ferguson relies too much on rhetoric rather than empirical evidence.
'Ferguson relies too much on rhetoric rather than empirical evidence.'
You wouldn't like to flesh out that aspersion, would you?
I'm just going off my personal impression based on a reading of one of his books and an article or two of his. It's possible I haven't sampled enough of his work to make an accurate judgement.
That's fine, any example of rhetoric over empirical evidence from that one book or either of the two articles will suffice.
It's been a while—I don't even remember the name of the book. I just recall that, despite its stylish prose, it seemed light on hard-core empirical content. I prefer a more straightforward, just-the-facts style with minimal filler.