Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael Magoon's avatar

I largely agree with you. I actually recently published an article entitled Central Moral Dilemma of the Left that makes similar points. It is part of a longer series of articles on the Origins of the Woke:

https://frompovertytoprogress.substack.com/p/the-central-moral-dilemma-of-the

I also agree that we cannot overcome the eternal cycle of failed Leftist ideologies until we squarely confront the reality of human genetic diversity and how it makes the moral goal of Equality impossible.

Where I disagree with you is the necessity of focusing on race. The reality is that racial differences only account for a very small amount of the variance in outcomes between individuals within the same society. So even if all of society accepts that all black/white differences in outcome are determined by genetics, then it does not get us very far.

There is still a huge disparity in outcomes among whites and a huge disparity among blacks. So the Left will just shift the debate from racial differences in outcomes to disparate outcomes on other dimensions.

So rather than accepting that black/white differences in outcome are to a large extent determined by genetics, we need to accept that ALL differences in outcome between individuals within the same society are largely determined by genetics.

So I believe that you are not pushing your argument for human genetic diversity far enough because you focus too much on race.

Expand full comment
ethnoexplorer's avatar

A thought-provoking piece. While I’ve long leaned anti-woke, this article made me reflect on the interplay between hereditarianism, environmental influences, and the broader political landscape.

My own experience as a second-generation Somali in the UK challenges strict hereditarianism. I’ve seen firsthand how peer groups, school systems, and migration policies shape life outcomes—even among siblings raised in the same household. Britain’s Somali diaspora, for example, is pragmatic rather than ideological—many leverage Black identity when useful but reject the moral logic of wokeness due to their Islamic worldview.

On a macro level, the contradiction at the heart of the liberal order is becoming untenable. Mass immigration is both an economic necessity (suppressing wages) and a growing social strain. Mainstream politicians fear a course correction, but in avoiding it, they risk losing control to a truly far-right movement—not just Reform or Trumpism, but something much more extreme.

You’re right to question whether woke ideology is inevitable or fragile—I’d argue it’s only “inevitable” as long as elites can sustain the contradictions. Once they break, the correction may be sharper than anyone expects.

Expand full comment
167 more comments...

No posts